#1
|
|||
|
|||
Damage
Should the damage of your primary and secondary weapon get lower and higher depending on the distance you fire. For instance take the loopys primary attack. If the target is closer to the loopy it may take 4-5 shots to take it down but, if the target was further away should the damage be reduced and it may take 6-7 shots to take it down?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
So, youre suggesting that if NKorea fires a rocket into Seoul, the city gets destroyed. If NKorea fires the same rocket at NYC, only an Uber driver's minivan gets blown up?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
This is too hard to process.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I think this would only be useful for unlimited range weapons, because it is giving a range to weapons. However, all the weapons already have a set range, so we don't need to give another weapon range. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The damage is done... | Danielle | The Water Cooler | 27 | 10-04-2010 02:45 PM |
Damage Report | evilarsenal | Suggestions | 3 | 02-21-2010 04:22 PM |
Bomb damage bug? | protest boy | Suggestions | 15 | 09-25-2009 06:36 AM |
Damage To Base | ViPR | Suggestions | 7 | 09-08-2009 01:30 AM |
Damage should saturate | TheCapedAvenger | Suggestions | 9 | 04-28-2009 08:29 PM |