Skyleague - Final Round (5) Groups + Times

[CCN]

Group 1: APL1, APL2
Ball (1)
TT (2)
Arr (3)
FC (4)
AH (5)


The games running down the left side are APL1, right side APL2
e.g 2v5 APL1 3v4 APL2


Group 2: APL 3 APL4
Twisted (6)
Tv0 (7)
Air (8)
CB (9)
{8) (10)

The games running down the left side are APL3, right side APL4


BO1
Round 1: 6PM GMT Planepark
Round 2: 6:30PM GMT Snow
Round 3: 7PM GMT Darkwar
Round 4: 7:30PM GMT Core
Round 5: 8PM GMT Maze


Top 2 advance to Cup, Bottom 3 play in bowl.


If i've missed anyone pm me ASAP


TieBreakers:

Played on Darkwar, play each other this week. Find a free server after the rounds are done.



10 Teams:
Cup:
1st = 20
2nd = 12
3rd = 8
4th = 6
Bowl:
5th = 4.5
6th = 3
7th: 2
8th: 2

[CCN]

Originally Posted by JWhatever

What is the format for the games? Bo1, bo3 etc.

-J

Thankyou for picking up on that.

It is Bo1 this week and Bo3 for the tournaments next week.

[SPeciaL]

i have 1 more sub space left. can i add now? i've pm you

[Sunaku]

Originally Posted by CCN

It is Bo1 this week

Have mercy on the hamsters powering some of our computers, by please putting back a decent warm-up timer on the servers. Because starting a bo1 5v6 might be too much fun to handle. Think of the rodents!

[CCN]

Originally Posted by Sunaku

Have mercy on the hamsters powering some of our computers, by please putting back a decent warm-up timer on the servers. Because starting a bo1 5v6 might be too much fun to handle. Think of the rodents!

hmm see what I can do, no promises. But if a team starts 5v6, respectful thing to do would be to let the ball die.

[robinb98]

CB change

***Omni Vanitas*** in instead of ***Memories***

***Jester||_||*** in instead of ***TwistedDucky***

***aaneton*** in instead of ***Fluffy***

[MajorPayne257]

sub trendy11one for leggo
sub ribilla for shmo

?

[lakospeter91]

Sorry guys, but we couldn't get 6 players, only 5. We waited for a 6th to show up for an hour in vain, so I told my team not to stay online.

All teams that were supposed to play against us will have a forfeit win.

It's my bad for signing up, I take responsibility for that.

[CCN]

Due to the 3 way ties, next week will be a tiebreaker.

Starting at 2:15pm EST.
Tie breaker rule for next week (if it ties again) will be inmplemented.

[shrode]

can we, for the love of god, play bo3?

[lakospeter91]

Sorry, but I had difficulty understanding your post. Does that mean that only the 6 teams that are tied, will play next week? (arr, T.T, AH, Air, tVo, twisted)

[CCN]

only 6 teams tied will play ext week, bo1's.

[Sunaku]

Originally Posted by CCN

only 6 teams tied will play ext week, bo1's.

I don't get it, why not use the actual points (total goals) as a tiebreaker right now?

Also, yeah to bo3s.

[CCN]

Originally Posted by Sunaku

I don't get it, why not use the actual points (total goals) as a tiebreaker right now?

Also, yeah to bo3s.

It's b01's and its not going ot use the points.

This is not debatable.

Edit: Actually it is.
If you convince Twisted and AH to take their loss by goals we can move on.


If people have other problems with the format, they can complain outside of this thread. Please also be advised I will not be reading said complaints.

[Sunaku]

Originally Posted by CCN

Edit: Actually it is.
If you convince Twisted and AH to take their loss by goals we can move on.

I don't need to convince anyone because the chart already did. It implied that points would be used in the end and no one had a problem with that, as the goals total is meaningful enough to play the tiebreaker role. Playing another week just seems unnecessary when we already have all the info we need.

[Duck Duck Pwn]

Solving a tie breaker by something that can lead to more tie breakers is ****ing retarded.

[CCN]

Originally Posted by Sunaku

I don't need to convince anyone because the chart already did. It implied that points would be used in the end and no one had a problem with that, as the goals total is meaningful enough to play the tiebreaker role. Playing another week just seems unnecessary when we already have all the info we need.

Originally Posted by Duck Duck Pwn

Solving a tie breaker by something that can lead to more tie breakers is ****ing retarded.

Nothing is changing.

Complain outside of this thread.
I will kindly ask admins to delete further derailing comments made in this thread.

[Dark_Sage]

Originally Posted by Sunaku

I don't get it, why not use the actual points (total goals) as a tiebreaker right now?

Also, yeah to bo3s.

If I am interpreting the chart right (and this isn't just because I'm in AH, as I haven't even had access to a computer that can run alti in the past 2 weeks), then this would be unfiar because I think TT forfeited, which only gives AH a 1 goal credit, whereas all the other teams in the bracket played TT when they had enough players, giving them more than a 1 goal credit. This also applies to the ball vs arr match, although ultimately it doesn't matter because ball won all 4 games. Otherwise I would agree with Sunaku, as teams should recieve recognition for losing a close game as opposed to being blown out.

[Nikon]

Did anyone record any of the matches?

[cipso]

Originally Posted by Nikon

Did anyone record any of the matches?

Yes, I have recorded Arr matches against FC (5v5), TT and AH. I missed match against {ball}, as you guys started ealier. I'm converting them now and will upload to youtube soon.

Update:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p3yaip-y2g (FC vs Arr)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNnRU0_BhTQ (Arr vs TT)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUyQ0cijDro (AH vs Arr)

[Sunaku]

Originally Posted by Dark_Sage

If I am interpreting the chart right (and this isn't just because I'm in AH, as I haven't even had access to a computer that can run alti in the past 2 weeks), then this would be unfiar because I think TT forfeited, which only gives AH a 1 goal credit, whereas all the other teams in the bracket played TT when they had enough players, giving them more than a 1 goal credit. This also applies to the ball vs arr match, although ultimately it doesn't matter because ball won all 4 games. Otherwise I would agree with Sunaku, as teams should recieve recognition for losing a close game as opposed to being blown out.

I see what you mean, but this is easily fixable. It would just require to give the team winning by a forfeit 6 points (for 6 virtual goals) and voilà!

{arr} didn't forfeit against {ball} and, surprisingly, even scored a few times; so the only reason I didn't argue the scores is because it was suddenly decided they would not be taken into account. Even if the chart pointed to the contrary from the start.
At the moment, I see no valid reason why we should play matches we have, actually, already played.

Hoping that giving feedback on the final round won't derail too much the thread about the final round. We wouldn't want that, now, would we?

[CCN]

This is a groups timings and results thread, not a feedback thread. If you want to give feedback create a thread, any and all feedback posted here is ignored.