Time Anchor is a misnomer!

[Corvus Crypt]

I am outraged. Time anchor does not reverse time, it simply moves you back a small distance no matter how fast you are traveling! If it was really a time anchor, you could double warp and travel back to where you were. I demand ACTION!

Well, not really, but I was wondering if anyone else has seen this and said - Something is terribly wrong here!

Figured the water cooler is the best place to post this without getting banned

[Beagle]

Well, no, the name seems pretty good to me.

Part of you is anchored to a previous point in your timeline - the trailing anchor behind you, in fact.

[-MH-CaptainVogez]

Time anchor is different to what it started as.

Originally (from memory), it actually based itself on a timeframe, where you would teleport yourself back to a position in time.
It still does, but it bases itself more on the distance travelled over a time.

[Sarah Palin]

WE HAVE TO GO BACK KATE! WE HAVE TO GO BAaaaack

[Evan20000]

The only change I'd make to the Anchor is to replace the Miranda with the Delorean.

[DiogenesDog]

Originally Posted by -MH-CaptainVogez

Time anchor is different to what it started as.

Originally (from memory), it actually based itself on a timeframe, where you would teleport yourself back to a position in time.
It still does, but it bases itself more on the distance travelled over a time.

This is correct.