Altitude Game: Forums  

Go Back   Altitude Game: Forums > Altitude Support > Suggestions
FAQ Community Calendar

Suggestions Post ideas and suggestions here.

View Poll Results: New planes
no 24 64.86%
yes 8 21.62%
don't care 5 13.51%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-30-2010, 05:02 PM
pilot riyo pilot riyo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: on the computer
Posts: 3
Default Planes

Since so many people here want new planes you should vote on it.

It's in the publics best intrest.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-30-2010, 05:31 PM
Stormich Stormich is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Corporate Police State
Posts: 1,151
Default

It's a full game, new planes would just ruin the balance.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-30-2010, 05:50 PM
Evan20000 Evan20000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Some desert nobody cares about
Posts: 4,594
Default

I can see new perks in the distant future, but not new planes. And what Storm said.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-30-2010, 05:59 PM
mlopes mlopes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London, UK
Posts: 832
Default

What we need is an even better biplane :P
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-30-2010, 07:04 PM
Demuyt Demuyt is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bath, UK
Posts: 3,427
Send a message via Skype™ to Demuyt
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlopes View Post
What we need is an even better biplane :P
Like the one in the official banner, with the gatling guns on its wings!


500th post
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-01-2010, 03:59 AM
SWN FIllichio KGB SWN FIllichio KGB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: EARTH
Posts: 213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormich View Post
It's a full game, new planes would just ruin the balance.
agreed. but it would be cool for like a whole new perk like for example red/blue/green and yellow

and if they did make a plane they should make it that its second weapon is like a shiled and normal weapon shoot the mini missiles

P.S.

they should also fix Biplane and tweek randa and like loopy could have a quadruple shot or triple shot, that be awesome
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-01-2010, 12:00 PM
Demuyt Demuyt is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bath, UK
Posts: 3,427
Send a message via Skype™ to Demuyt
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SWN FIllichio KGB View Post
loopy could have a quadruple shot or triple shot, that be awesome
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-01-2010, 01:44 PM
SWN FIllichio KGB SWN FIllichio KGB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: EARTH
Posts: 213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Demuyt View Post
LOL, so u don't agree??
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-01-2010, 01:50 PM
Boko Boko is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Cocation
Posts: 1,392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SWN FIllichio KGB View Post
LOL, so u don't agree??
It's not that he doesn't agree, we don't know that, he's just suggesting that you commit suicide.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-01-2010, 02:11 PM
mlopes mlopes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London, UK
Posts: 832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SWN FIllichio KGB View Post
LOL, so u don't agree??
I don't think anyone on their right mind would agree to double the loopy spam...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boko View Post
It's not that he doesn't agree, we don't know that, he's just suggesting that you commit suicide.
Calm down, I heard he's like 11 years old or so.

Last edited by mlopes; 07-01-2010 at 02:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-01-2010, 03:01 PM
Demuyt Demuyt is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bath, UK
Posts: 3,427
Send a message via Skype™ to Demuyt
Default

I'd never suggest such a thing, I was just trying to express my controversy against the double spam idea
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-01-2010, 03:12 PM
nostrich nostrich is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 40
Default

You have to remember (or realise) how hard it is to effectively balance a game like this. (And I'm talking about the balance of fun as much as I am about the balance of power.) The more elements you add, the more difficult it becomes. There are 5 planes right now, and however many perks. Adding just one new thing means it has to be balanced against all those things. Look at the recent Bip patch, the afterburner energy usage was reduced by only 5% and the range increased by only 10. It's small incremental changes like that that work towards a well-balanced game, and introducing something new (and, frankly, unnecessary) means a whole ****load more minor and not so minor tweaks to make everything play nice together. If you're familiar with the trope of a butterfly flapping its wings and causing a tornado elsewhere, it should be easy for you to identify how much work adding something like that would be. Is your desire for a new plane really so great that you'd have that much development time spent on it, when it could be used for better things? Look through the suggestions forum and you see numerous things that could be prioritised above new planes. I mean, have you seen the server list? And the friends list? And the number of complaints about already existing planes? The great demand for more and better achievements? The frankly awful menu design? The ping on international servers? (I am convinced that could be better.) And I'm guessing the devs have a list of bugs as long as your arm, too.

I'm just saying, do you really need more than 5 planes? I say no.

Also, I've read a bunch of the new plane threads here, and I have yet to see a compelling reason for adding any of them. That's me, of course, and my opinions don't represent anyone but myself, but I suggest taking a more critical approach to ideas like this.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-01-2010, 03:27 PM
Demuyt Demuyt is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bath, UK
Posts: 3,427
Send a message via Skype™ to Demuyt
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nostrich View Post
you have to remember (or realise) how hard it is to effectively balance a game like this. (and i'm talking about the balance of fun as much as i am about the balance of power.) the more elements you add, the more difficult it becomes. There are 5 planes right now, and however many perks. Adding just one new thing means it has to be balanced against all those things. Look at the recent bip patch, the afterburner energy usage was reduced by only 5% and the range increased by only 10. It's small incremental changes like that that work towards a well-balanced game, and introducing something new (and, frankly, unnecessary) means a whole ****load more minor and not so minor tweaks to make everything play nice together. If you're familiar with the trope of a butterfly flapping its wings and causing a tornado elsewhere, it should be easy for you to identify how much work adding something like that would be. Is your desire for a new plane really so great that you'd have that much development time spent on it, when it could be used for better things? Look through the suggestions forum and you see numerous things that could be prioritised above new planes. I mean, have you seen the server list? And the friends list? And the number of complaints about already existing planes? The great demand for more and better achievements? The frankly awful menu design? The ping on international servers? (i am convinced that could be better.) and i'm guessing the devs have a list of bugs as long as your arm, too.

I'm just saying, do you really need more than 5 planes? I say no.

Also, i've read a bunch of the new plane threads here, and i have yet to see a compelling reason for adding any of them. That's me, of course, and my opinions don't represent anyone but myself, but i suggest taking a more critical approach to ideas like this.
+100000000
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-01-2010, 03:34 PM
mlopes mlopes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London, UK
Posts: 832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Demuyt View Post
I'd never suggest such a thing, I was just trying to express my controversy against the double spam idea
That's how I interpreted it, as a "anti-double spam" statment and nothing more.

Last edited by mlopes; 07-01-2010 at 03:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-01-2010, 04:59 PM
Demuyt Demuyt is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bath, UK
Posts: 3,427
Send a message via Skype™ to Demuyt
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlopes View Post
That's how I interpreted it, as a "anti-double spam" statment and nothing more.
Good job!

I wish some people could understand us
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-01-2010, 05:08 PM
Boko Boko is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Cocation
Posts: 1,392
Default

I'm sorry, I must have misinterpreted the 'suicide-bear-didnt-even-leave-a-not.jpg' picture. I'll post a random picture too.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-01-2010, 05:23 PM
mlopes mlopes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London, UK
Posts: 832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boko View Post
I'm sorry, I must have misinterpreted the 'suicide-bear-didnt-even-leave-a-not.jpg' picture. I'll post a random picture too.

Is that a Santa, full of loopy spam handing a suicide note?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
2008 Nimbly Games LLC