zuggeztion: ladder mapz

[zz-]

You know how ladder won't let 'custom start_random' pick the same map 2x in a row? IMO it should exclude the last TWO maps, because usually you're playing every other game, and pretty frequently you end up playing the same map 2x in a row. Also the added benefit of simply increasing the overall variety in maps.

Yez? How ez would thiz be 2 do?

[Radium]

zZ+
zzzzZZZzZ

[Tekn0]

Originally Posted by zz-

You know how ladder won't let 'custom start_random' pick the same map 2x in a row? IMO it should exclude the last TWO maps, because usually you're playing every other game, and pretty frequently you end up playing the same map 2x in a row. Also the added benefit of simply increasing the overall variety in maps.

Yez? How ez would thiz be 2 do?

I suggested this a long time ago (not in the forums, in game) and many people did not even understand what this is. They were like "it -is- random already". Sigh.

And yes, ladder should not pick the last 2 maps already picked. It's stupid to get the horrible ufo map 3 times in a row.

[zz-]

Actually tekno, when i type altitude forums in my address bar it sends me to an old thread of mine and i just navigate from there because im lazy. The point of this story is that in that thread...

Originally Posted by Tekn0

This. chars!

We are palying alternate games spectating one in between. At least make the random skip last 2 maps instead of just one.

[zz-]

Hello? Bump? this is a no-brainer imo, admins thoughts?

[Aki1024]

What is simple to say isn't simple to code and move to prod. My apologies, but this won't be available in the near future.

[AzzedariuSuiradezza]

Originally Posted by Aki1024

What is simple to say isn't simple to code and move to prod. My apologies, but this won't be available in the near future.

How can you not devote more time to our uneducated wishes?

[Tekn0]

Originally Posted by Aki1024

What is simple to say isn't simple to code and move to prod. My apologies, but this won't be available in the near future.

The logic is dead simple, it must be some unavailability of required data that causing the problem?
Care to explain what is so hard about it? Honest question.

[zz-]

Ok thanks aki, that's the reply i was looking for. well actually I was looking for "yeah good idea we can do that in the next 30 minutes." i really dont know anything about coding so i had no expectations ~~

[Aki1024]

Originally Posted by Tekn0

The logic is dead simple, it must be some unavailability of required data that causing the problem?
Care to explain what is so hard about it? Honest question.

The current parser is considered read only. I agree that the code is easy. Next question logically is "Why is the parser read only?" It has been troublesome to test the php parser, making changes difficult to prove safe for prod.