Standards

[Clam]

By popular demand, we present to you

PUBLIC POLL: STANDARDS



Description:

Suppose there is a girl between 20 and 25 years of age.

Suppose there is also a number of guys she has slept with.

Then suppose that, based on that number, she is considered a [insert epithet here]*.

What is the minimum value of that number?

*slut

[Demuyt]

are you the girl

[Winters Ark]

Clam, are you trying to say I'm a slut?

Oh, and I'll be at your place by 2. Leave the money in the usual place, I'll pick it up on the way out.

[CCN]

Originally Posted by Winters Ark

Clam, are you trying to say I'm a slut?

Oh, and I'll be at your place by 2. Leave the money in the usual place, I'll pick it up on the way out.

Amateur

You take the money at the start and count it in the bathroom!

[GGQ]

Yikes, 0-3 is winning the poll? For a girl in her 20s? What world do you guys live in?

[Kafka]

Originally Posted by GGQ

What world do you guys live in?

One with a massive double standard

[sunshineduck]

your sexual identity is not determined by the number of people you have slept with

[Clapon]

Originally Posted by sunshineduck

your sexual identity is not determined by the number of people you have slept with

preach brother

[Ingbo]

Originally Posted by sunshineduck

your sexual identity is not determined by the number of people you have slept with

^ making it a 0-3 minimum requirement. Also u should really have an alternative to not be considered a [insert epithet here].

[Slender]

Originally Posted by Ingbo

^ making it a 0-3 minimum requirement. Also u should really have an alternative to not be considered a [insert epithet here].

i think it depends on the situation and context where the girl is put, mostly behind of why she's slept with X amount of guys, 4-9 seems to me fair enough for any reason

[Ingbo]

Originally Posted by Slender

i think it depends on the situation and context where the girl is put, mostly behind of why she's slept with X amount of guys, 4-9 seems to me fair enough for any reason

The number of people u have sex with doesnt decide it ur a slut or not, which is why the minimum requirement is 0-3, and numbers overall uninteresting is the point me and ssd made.

[Clapon]

however if youre young 20s and you get passed 10 i might start thinking youre a slut regardless of what you tell me

[Slender]

Originally Posted by Ingbo

The number of people u have sex with doesnt decide it ur a slut or not, which is why the minimum requirement is 0-3, and numbers overall uninteresting is the point me and ssd made.

Well yes, but then the poll made above has no reason to be. As I said, i think that rather numbers defining you as a slut, it's the reason of why you're sleeping with x number of guys. Disregard my first post then, the amount has always been irrelevant

[Ingbo]

Originally Posted by Slender

Well yes, but then the poll made above has no reason to be. As I said, i think that rather numbers defining you as a slut, it's the reason of why you're sleeping with x number of guys. Disregard my first post then, the amount has always been irrelevant

ye this is why i said he should have added an alternative to state that opinion as well :P

[Clam]

I figured if I put an "other" option everyone would just pick that one and we'd get no numbers at all, useless though they may ultimately be. But since everyone's talking about non-numbers defining purity vs [insert epithet]-hood, let's get some concrete reasons for the following two scenarios:

Suppose there is a relatively "normal" girl who has slept with relatively "few" guys, whatever that means to you - 0, 1/8, 37, etc.
What reasons/behaviors would qualify her for [insert epithet]?

Suppose there is a relatively "normal" girl who has slept with comparatively "many" guys - 0, 1.75, 568, etc.
What reasons/behaviors would make her ineligible for being a [insert epithet]?

*"Normal" here excludes sex slaves, incredibly lustful nuns, and other generally extreme or unusual situations.

[Ingbo]

For me to answer those questions, ull have to define [insert epithet] :S

[Clam]

Trying to keep it relatively worksafe so the whole thing doesn't get deleted, but here you go, you massive [insert epithet]*.

*slut

[Ingbo]

for both "normal" and "many" my definition would be girls that are massively attention seeking/immature/rude/loud, who sleeps with most they get a chance to, self-esteem built up around sleeping with others, show no loyalty to boundaries of friends of theirs (ie sleeps with bfs friends if thats a no-go for her friends, sleeps with exes of friends etc).